Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg vs Mika Brunold Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 May at 10:02 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Gueymard Wayenburg vs M. Brunold

FRA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

SUI
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Wayenburg 2 - 0 Brunold
They have played 5 sets in total, with Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg winning 4 and Mika Brunold winning 1. The last match between Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg and Mika Brunold was at the Prague Challenger, 04-05-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wayenburg | 2 |
| Brunold | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Prague Challenger(05-04-25)
(R1) Quimper Challenger(01-22-25)
S. G. Wayenburg vs M. Brunold H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $80,200 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.29% (162-131) | Career Total W/L | 57.07% (113-85) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 4 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. G. Wayenburg vs M. Brunold Match Preview:
Examining the performance on second serves over the past six months, Wayenburg has secured 45.47% of points, which surpasses Brunold's 41.16%. When analyzing break point conversion, Wayenburg has successfully converted 32.93% of opportunities, compared to Brunold's 28.42%. These metrics are significant for predicting match outcomes, offering insights into players' likelihood to leverage critical moments.
Looking at the return game, Wayenburg has an edge with a 47.6% success rate against their opponent's second serve, slightly higher than Brunold's 47.46%. The first serve return statistics also favor Wayenburg, who leads with 27.93% over Brunold's 26.92%. Such statistical measurements are pivotal in determining the favored player in head-to-head matchups.
Brunold boasts a stronger win rate over the past year, achieving victory in 65.79% of matches, while Wayenburg has won 50% of their matches. Despite this, in head-to-head encounters, Wayenburg has prevailed, winning both the single meeting and two out of the three sets played against Brunold. Their previous match at the Quimper Challenger saw Wayenburg claim a 0-6, 6-3, 6-3 triumph.
Assessing performance under pressure, Brunold has saved 49.46% of breakpoints, slightly better than Wayenburg's 48.13%. Consideration of deciding set outcomes reveals that Wayenburg has a 43% success rate, marginally higher than Brunold's 37%. These figures can influence predictions, especially if the match approaches a deciding set.
Reflecting on their career surface preferences, Brunold exhibits a preference for clay, with a win rate of 60%, while Wayenburg shines on indoor hard courts with a 61% success rate. These surface-specific strengths could influence future encounters depending on the playing conditions.
Understanding the level of play, Brunold has demonstrated a higher win rate in Challenger/ITF tournaments over $10K, with a 59.52% success rate, compared to Wayenburg's 44.74%. This suggests Brunold's consistency at these competitive levels may offer an advantage.
In terms of opponent quality, Wayenburg has faced tougher competition over the last year, playing against adversaries with an average rank of 238.97, compared to Brunold's 412.87. This experience might provide Wayenburg with a strategic edge going into the match.
Pulling together these statistics and historical performances, Wayenburg emerges as the likely favorite to triumph in their upcoming contest, influenced by their superior recent form, head-to-head advantage, and ability to handle pressure situations more effectively.
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg vs Mika Brunold Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. G. Wayenburg vs M. Brunold H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 24 | Games Won | 18 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:31:32 | Average Match Time | 1:31:32 |
| 57% (75/131) | 1st Serve % | 58% (76/132) |
| 76% (57/75) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (52/76) |
| 38% (21/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (20/56) |
| 60% (9/15) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (6/16) |
| 45% (60/132) | Return Points Win % | 40% (53/131) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. G. Wayenburg Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 1-6 6-1 | ||
SF | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | ||
M. Brunold Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-7(6) 7-6(9) 7-5 | ||
QF | L | 6-7(4) 6-1 7-6(0) | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||

S. G. Wayenburg vs M. Brunold Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.29% (162/131) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.07% (113/85) |
| 55.04% (377/308) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.11% (257/201) |
| 52.22% (3403/3114) | Games Win/Loss | 52.19% (2274/2083) |
| 53.85% (42/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.75% (7/9) |
| 53.33% (40/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.12% (68/49) |
| 58.09% (79/57) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.46% (38/27) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.58 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1833 | Aces Total | 473 |
| 0.41 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 1316 | Total Double Faults | 719 |
| 1:38:36 | Average Match Time | 1:46:17 |
| 440.93 | Average Opponent Rank | 429.29 |
| 57% (11732/20655) | 1st Serve % | 60% (8143/13592) |
| 73% (8511/11732) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (5433/8143) |
| 48% (4260/8923) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2693/5449) |
| 43% (908/2132) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (643/1477) |
| 41% (8512/20995) | Return Points Win % | 42% (5728/13723) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/6) |
| 44.09% (41/52) | Challenger W/L | 57.14% (48/36) |
| 63.10% (118/69) | Futures W/L | 60.19% (65/43) |
| 55% (161/292) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (109/194) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 48% (45/93) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (39/66) |
| 46% (46/100) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (29/62) |
| 84% (168/141) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (110/93) |
| 16% (168/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (110/17) |
| 17% (125/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (88/20) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
